I read a post by Salon’s Steven Hill the other day that got me thinking. The title?

The Uber-economy Fucks Us All: How ‘Permalancers’ and ‘Sharer’ Gigs Gut the Middle Class.”

As a permanent full-time freelancer and a member of the middle class, I desperately wanted to know how my job, and the jobs of over one-third of the US workforce, was killing the country’s economy.

The title alone probably should have given me pause before clicking. First of all – he said ‘fuck.’ If this was going to be some sort of brainy academic analysis of the economic costs and benefits of this new way of working, then I think…well…I think that would have been the title. “A Brainy Academic Analysis of the Economic Costs and Benefits of Permalancing and Sharing Gigs, by Salon’s Steven Hill.”

Alas, it was not meant to be.

No, this was going to be an angry post full of angry words written by an angry man. And, sure enough, the first thing you see when the page comes up is an angry picture of a very angry Donald Trump.

Oh boy.

And so we begin with the first sentence:

A significant factor in the decline of the quality of jobs in the United States has been employers’ increasing reliance on “non-regular” employees — a growing army of freelancers, temps, contractors, part-timers, day laborers, micro-entrepreneurs, gig-preneurs, solo-preneurs, contingent labor, perma-lancers and perma-temps.

Hill goes on, over the course of the next 1200 words, to detail a laundry list of complaints that he has with this new reliance on non-W2 workers:

  • Companies aren’t responsible for contractor’s benefits, retirement, sick leave, vacation time, or any of the other perks that come with full-time employment.
  • It breaks the agreement that corporations made with workers during the New Deal, creating a dystopian world of “on-again, off-again” employees.
  • You only get paid for the work you’re actually doing. Mr. Hill no longer gets paid to go to the bathroom or chat at the water cooler, and this was a big enough problem for him that he included it as a complaint in his post.
  • You have to track multiple income streams and exert effort to make sure that you get paid for the work you do.

The list goes on and on. The “1099’ed” economy means the end of the “good jobs that have supported American families,” the end of the middle class, and the start of the decline of the United States as a world leader.

Oh please.

While I understand that most of his anger is directed at the companies that have triggered this shift and not so much with the people who now live and work it, I still have to ask a fairly basic question:

Mr. Hill, could it be that freelancing just isn’t for you?

And couldn’t you be ok with that rather than condemning the choice that millions of Americans have made in their method of work and “the sky is falling” your way to the end of American civilization as we know it?

Hill wrote his post as the result of having been laid off. And believe me; I understand the anger that comes with a layoff. When I was working in the technology industry I was laid off twice in less than a year. Both jobs were outstanding opportunities that evaporated because…well…what good does it do to try to place blame at this point. Business is business and the choices that businesses make have consequences for their employees. Anyone who has held a job in the past decade can attest to that.

But, in his anger, Hill has made some assertions about life in this freelanced economy that I, and those like me, have to take issue with.

I voluntarily left full-time employment to work for myself and become a full-time freelancer. I wasn’t forced out. It wasn’t a “resign or be fired” situation. No, my desk was empty the day after my final two week notice because I chose not to go back.

And, honestly, I don’t know what it would take to get me to go back to that life. Everything that Mr. Hill abhors about the freelance life is something that I adore because it has made me infinitely better at what I do.

I’m the person that gets called when companies don’t have someone on staff that can solve their problem. Every dollar I make is made because I’ve added value to a situation that required my assistance in order for it to become successful. While companies and corporations lumber their way through their day to day operations, carrying their full-timers on their backs and paying for their best and their worst work, I have to create value 100% of the time or my clients will find someone else who can.

Subsequently, I’m able to charge for the value I provide, and my services are not cheap. However, as if following the tired “they’re taking our jobs!” battlecry to a T, Hill focuses his attention and energy on the lost income and “race to the bottom” aspects of freelance income generation. Try hard enough and you can actually see the same arguments used by the anti-immigrant community creep into Hill’s anti-freelance sentiment.

those with money will be able to use faceless, anonymous interactions via brokerage websites and mobile apps to hire those without money by forcing an online bidding war to see who will charge the least for their labor

and later

Indeed, the so-called “new” economy looks an awful lot like the old, pre-New Deal economy – with “jobs” amounting to a series of low-paid micro-gigs and piece work, offering little empowerment for average workers, families or communities.

For freelancers that focus on providing value to their clients and ensuring that they are functioning as valued members of their clients’ teams, this “race to the bottom” is a figment of the imagination. It doesn’t exist. We don’t compete in that space.

Properly executed, the plans I have for 2016 will lead to income levels over and above what I ever made as a full-time employee of any one company. See, while Mr. Hill complains about not being paid for time not spent working, I spend my time figuring out how to become more valuable to my clients. Rather than talking about the weather while I wait for the Lean Cuisine that I pulled out of a disgusting shared freezer to finish microwaving, I’m figuring out new ways to make my clients successful.

I compete on value, not on price and, as a result, have been repeatedly tasked with “fixing” work that other, low-priced bargain basement freelancers screwed up. At times, I’ve been able to do things that a company’s full-timers simply couldn’t make happen. Why?

Because changing course on a jet ski is a hell of a lot of easier than turning a cruise ship.

And I’ve done this while enjoying all kinds of benefits.

While I don’t have sick leave or paid vacation time, I work when and where I want to work at times that are convenient for both me and my wife, who also happens to work a non-traditional schedule. As a result, we see each other more than we could dream of if I was forced into a standard 9 to 5.

I’ve set my own rate as a function of the value I provide to the clients that I work with, rather than laying down at my full-time employer’s feet and hoping that they can find it in their heart to give me a cost of living increase for the year…a function of inflation and economic conditions; not my organizational contribution or value.

I pick and choose the projects I want to work on. If I don’t feel a task or an employer is a good fit, I simply decline it.

I am talent for hire and my skills and abilities go to the highest bidder, not the lowest. I am the most professionally empowered that I have ever been.

And what do I give in return for all of this? I have to work to find jobs to fill gaps when I’m not working with my regular, repeat clients and, no, I don’t get paid for that time. I have to pay more in taxes and track the finances of my business rather than just checking to make sure that my direct deposit went through every two weeks. I have to be “on” 100% of the time. And, I have to constantly question and take inventory of whether my business is moving in the direction I envisioned when I started it.

If Mr. Hill ever finds another full-time job, and I hope he does, then I wish him the best in it. But that world is no longer for me and millions of people like me. We understand that corporate loyalty died with our grandparents and the freelancing economy is simply that death taken to its logical conclusion as seen from the workers’ side.

The wonderful thing that no one could have ever seen coming, however, is that we don’t need the full-time employment of those corporations and companies and the bullshit that comes with it. Rather than completely surrendering to a fate over which we have no control, we’ve chosen to seize the opportunity presented by living in this era and become our own businesses. Technology allows us to enjoy freedoms that we never could have considered while under the thumb of a W2. I don’t need an office park, a cubicle, casual Fridays, and an office manager tracking whether I’m two minutes late through the door in the morning.

I need my laptop, some wifi, and a decent cup of coffee.

My life is far from dystopian, Mr. Hill. In fact, it’s the closest I’ve been to Utopia in my entire professional existence.

By | 2017-05-18T19:08:25+00:00 November 5th, 2015|Independent Business|1 Comment

About the Author:

Eric Fadden is a copywriter and content developer. He lives in Philadelphia, PA and makes his living putting letters together to form words but he makes those words sound really, really good.

One Comment

  1. Bernardo Margulis November 5, 2015 at 3:11 pm - Reply

    I think they key here is choice vs. need, and we need to embrace the idea of choice as you suggest.

    There’s a big movement in academia to get adjunct instructors unionized because we get shafted left and right. I agree 100% with the movement, but it’s a movement based on people who teach for a living and need to make it work by going to three or four different schools (which is a similar situation as with forced freelancers, because it’s a trend imposed by the institutions, not the teachers). But I teach because I like it, and while it helps me pay my rent, it’s a supplement to my full-time freelance business, not my go-to source of income. I choose how much or how little to teach, and thus I choose which classes to take based on my ROI (personally and financially).

    In terms of freelancing, I have been on both ends; I was a full-time freelancer for a company for 2.5 years because they didn’t hire people to avoid paying benefits, but then I jumped ship and elected to be an independent freelancer. In both cases I enjoyed the freedoms I got from the model—more $$$, more flexible schedule—and was ok putting up with the crap that comes with the model because I ended up on top anyway.

Leave A Comment